I have begun playing with the new vRanger 4 DPP Beta 2 to see how it compares with the current version and more importantly with the current rival Veeam 3.0.1.
Firstly it is important to note vRanger 4 is beta – there are bugs but the basics seem to work. I am not going to go into the differences between its predecessor – there are numerous major changes which you can check out at Vizioncore’s website.
However I thought I would just try a little test to see how vRanger and Veeam compare in a simple head to head backup.
I was using an HP Minitower with SATA drives as the backup server running both products – connecting to the same VMWare ESX 3.5 host (an HP DL380 G5 with local SAS disk). All were running 1Gb NICs.
The VM Guest being backed up was a 20GB Windows 2003 image – the results were as follows:
Vizioncore vRanger 4 DPP Beta 2
Time Taken : 17m2s
Backup Size : 4.9GB
Reported Throughput : 22MB/s
Veeam 3.0.1 (Set to Optimal compression)
Time Taken : 15m17s
Backup Size : 8.9GB
Reported Throughput : 22MB/s
Veeam 3.0.1 (Set to Best compression)
Time Taken : 14m6s
Backup Size : 8.9GB
Reported Throughput : 24MB/s
EDIT: After advice from Anton (see below reply) I recreated the job for the Best setting – the results were as below so Veeam still wins the race on speed / compression
Time Taken : 15m23s
Backup Size : 4.5GB
Reported Throughput : 22MB/s
I ran multiple tests for vRanger to ensure the same result and two different tests as noted above for Veeam as it had the option for altering the compression settings – ironically while this ‘Best’ function improved the speed of the backup the resulting file was the same size. Overall vRanger was acheiving compression of 75% versus Veeam’s 55% – it will be up to the individual to whether speed or size is most important.
So things are looking hopeful for vRanger at this stage although until a finished product is released there is no certainty what the final build will achieve. There are still quite a few glitches in the beta gui that need attention before it will be as clean as Veeam in terms of speed and usability.
Continue Reading
